containing multitudes since 2004
Not from the stars do I my judgement pluck;And yet methinks I have Astronomy,But not to tell of good or evil luck,Of plagues, of dearths, or seasons' quality;Nor can I fortune to brief minutes tell,Pointing to each his thunder, rain and wind,Or say with princes if it shall go wellBy oft predict that I in heaven find:But from thine eyes my knowledge I derive,And, constant stars, in them I read such artAs truth and beauty shall together thrive,If from thyself, to store thou wouldst convert; Or else of thee this I prognosticate:Thy end is truth's and beauty's doom and date.
Known as the Chandos portrait (c1610) this is regarded by The National Gallery as an authentic portrait of Shakespeare by John Taylor done during his lifetime. Peter Ackroyd in his biog of the Bard writes of this portrait "It was once suggested, half in earnest, that it was Shakespeare dressed to play Shylock. The painting itself has a long and complicated history which is to say that its provenance is uncertain"
As I recall, this was renamed "Portrait of an unknown man" because no one knows just what William Shakspeare looked like.And yes, it's Shakspeare. Not Shakespeare. The only document ever found in his own hand is his last will and testament and the name is spelled "Shakspeare." And even that has additions not in Shakspeare's writing.Shake-Speare was the name used when the poem Venus and Adonis was first published in 1593. Hyphenated and with no first name. Shakspeare is not Shake-Speare. They are two different people.If you must have a picture, I suggest this one.
Post a Comment