containing multitudes since 2004
I remember seeing Andre de Toth complain about Hitchcock, on a TCM or A&E biography type show. In the interview, he said Hitchcock's movies were like Hitchcock himself: fat and lazy. I thought he was being a jerk, personally. What if a skinny guy had made Hitchcock's films, what epithet would he have said then?
That the plots were thin?BTW...another de Toth has hit DVD: Play Dirty with Michael Caine. It's late career stuff, but I've heard good things about it so far...
I was going to say he'd use the word 'undernourished', but I like yours better.Could be a personal animus. De Toth and Hitchcock both worked at Warner Brothers around the same time (1953 or thereabouts). Perhaps they had a contretemps in the cafeteria line?Play Dirty is, to me, one of de Toth's very best films. It's like a meaner, leaner reworking of The Dirty Dozen, but bereft of all sentimentality (added to which, Caine's performance is an interesting echo of his work in Cyril Endfield's Zulu).
I just got my copy in the mail, and I can't wait to watch it. I haven't been disappointed by his work yet (and still haven't seen Ramrod or Dark Waters, among others).
I've heard "Play Dirty" is amazing, thanks for the head's up that it's on DVD now. I'd never have expected it.You're right, of course, de Toth would have simply come up with some other appearance-based insult.
"Play Dirty" was always a fave of mine, mostly for Caine and Davenport, but it's one of few films of that genre' - the mercenary films from the '60s - that still wears well all these years later. As for deToth, he always seems a bit full of himself, or something, in interviews.
Post a Comment