Containing Multitudes Since 2004
What's amazing about this picture is that it's 1965 and you really don't see anything. So I checked my 50th Anniversary Playboy and deiscovered that you cheated Tom; this isn't the actual centerfold shot.
Shhhhh . . .Centerfold, shmenterfold. She hot!Actually, I was originally going to call this The Art of the Playmate, but I wanted to leave it open lest I found similar images from publications other than Playboy. Art of the Centerfold seemed like an appropriately generic title.
That's probably the best photo you've ever posted.
Hey, I don't deny that she's hot. In fact I think that this picture is an order of magnitude hotter than the actual centerfold shot where she's showing off her goodies. There's a mixture of sauciness and innocence (or something) here that is totally absent in her gatefold shot.
Actually, Playboy had a nice feel for saucy innocence, especially when the girls were partially clad - the suggestive was always stonger than the objective in the old Playboys. Playboy modelling back then seemed less straight porno for one-handed reading than it was a projection of carefully managed naturalness, especially compared to the "sleazier" mags. The focus was different than nowadays, and a kind of purity that came of the lighting they often used is sadly no longer in fashion. Yeah, it might've been the height of "blow-off", by a very sophisticated carnival, but, damn, I looked forward to them. BCNU
What best about the pic (if you're a femme bombarded by the fake) is how natural and real all the body parts are. Real softeness, real breasts, perfectly acceptable and delicious.
Beautiful! I'd say her look is one of "mischievous curiosity" - excellent shot!
Post a Comment