containing multitudes since 2004
(mucho mucho thanks to Jim King for this image)
I've been a little obsessed with this film ever since I first spotted this poster in a Sotheby's film poster auction catalogue. Alas, I quickly discovered that for whatever reason (it's Paramount for a start), no print of the film is known to exist. For an idea of how heartbreaking this is, click the link atop the image and check out the IMDb entry for this star-studded look at the grinding wheels of the movie business.
Wow.I'd read that this was one of those films with a plethora of cameos, but from the IMDb link it seems like the entire Paramount lot was showed up (and then some).It's an old lament, but . . . whydid they let these films slip through their fingers?Depressing.
Sadly, once sound hit, those vaults full of silent titles became a financial and safety liability. Those pesky vault fires--London After Midnight existed up into the '60s, until it met a fiery death--were a real danger. And it simply wasn't worth it to the studios to devote any time, energy, space and $ to maintaining libraries of films they couldn't release (and could recover the silver from the nitrate).
Yeah. I knew all that. Mine was just a rhetorical question needs to be asked every once in a while in case we all forget.
I figured as much. But for all those other fine folks out there in television land who are just figuring out that the bulk of our early film heritage has either crumbled into dust, gone up in flames or been purposefully destroyed...a refresher never hurts.Can't help it...I'm a sucker for rhetorical questions...
Post a Comment