Containing Multitudes Since 2004
Here, might as well use up the whole box:http://www.wapko.com/louise_brooks/pic3.jpg
Whoa!What is the internet coming to?Until yesterday this was a family blog.I'll have to study this image further before I decide on posting it, Stephen. But I thank you for the contribution.Made my morning.
Yeah, I figured for the sake of discretion, a cut and paste link might be better than posting it wholesale.I don't care about corrupting kids--if only I'd been so corrupted--it's geezers like me having heart attacks I'm concerned about.
Stephen wrote:I don't care about corrupting kids--if only I'd been so corrupted--it's geezers like me having heart attacks I'm concerned about. *****I gravely doubt any kids are looking at this blog, so I don't have a problem putting up these photos. God knows if I was a young'un, I'd be surfing for real, honest to goodness porn night and day.You did, however, neglect to inform me of one lulu of a Lulu:http://www.wapko.com/louise_brooks/pic1.jpgI may indeed post that one, but I thought I'd put the link here for all you horny comment readers.
That sir is "art" not pornography. You cantell because it's in black & whiteAmazing what a couple of pictures taken 80 years ago can do for someone. Now if you only could dig up the Lucille Ball photo (the one that's in one of her biographies)
Calm thyself, Brent. I heard ya the first time (j/k)I didn't know about any Lucille Ball photo. I'm already wildly intrigued.Thanks!
Post a Comment